Knowledge Base flags conflicting information from uploaded documents for review. Resolve disagreement before relying on affected curated page.
Example: Resolve conflicting supplier and notice terms
Scenario: Two sources for one agreement disagree about supplier name, annual fee, and notice period.
-
Read both source documents before selecting review action. Example: existing names Zephyr Cloud Services Ltd; new names Summit Data Systems Ltd.
-
If new document is verified authoritative version, choose Keep New. If original remains authoritative, choose Keep Existing.
-
Choose Merge only when correct combined statement is supported by reviewed source evidence. Missing Clause 2.4 or Schedule B is not proof of any particular term.
-
When merging, write verified supplier, fee, and notice period into editable statement, then choose Save Merged Page.
-
After resolution, check curated page and citations. Original uploaded sources remain evidence and are not edited by review choice.
Find conflicts
-
Open Admin > AI Studio > Knowledge > Knowledge Base.
-
Select Needs review.
-
Check number of conflicts awaiting resolution.
-
Open conflict card. Compare New and Existing (current page) summaries.
-
Read explanation below summaries. It identifies conflicting details and names source files.
A conflict may involve different supplier names, fees, notice periods, or missing references for same agreement. Compare original documents before deciding. Ready under Sources means source processing completed; it does not mean flagged conflict has been resolved.
Choose how to resolve
|
Action |
When to use |
|---|---|
|
Keep New |
New source has verified, current information that should replace existing curated page content. |
|
Keep Existing |
Existing curated page is accurate, and new source is outdated or incorrect. |
|
Merge |
Open editor to write combined statement. Saving replaces existing curated-page summary while retaining both uploaded sources as evidence. |
Check first: If documents disagree about material facts, such as contracting party, amount, or cancellation terms, verify correct information with document owner. Do not merge contradictory terms without checking.
Merge source information
-
In conflict card, select Merge.
-
Under Write the combined statement for the merged page, review text in editable field. It may contain proposed statement from new source.
-
Rewrite statement so it reflects verified information from both sources. Do not copy contradictory terms into one statement without resolving them.
-
Select Save Merged Page. This replaces existing curated-page summary; both uploaded sources remain as evidence.
-
To leave without saving, select Cancel.
Note: Merge combines content through administrator-edited statement. It does not automatically determine which conflicting supplier, fee, or notice period is correct.
Verify result
-
After choosing an action, return to Needs review and confirm flagged item no longer needs attention.
-
Open Pages and inspect affected curated page. Confirm details match decision.
-
For source traceability, open Sources. Uploaded original files remain unchanged by conflict-review choices.
-
If necessary, use Ask to ask specific question about corrected information and inspect source citation.
Important distinctions
-
Needs review addresses disagreements between sources. New pages without flagged disagreements publish automatically within Knowledge Base.
-
Sources retains uploaded documents. Conflict decision selects content for curated Pages, rather than editing original files.
-
If original document itself is wrong, correct document with owner and follow document replacement process; resolving page conflict does not correct source text.